iddisplay_ordertopicquestionshort_answeranswer_htmlexample_htmlkeywordsrelated_jobsfeaturedpublishedcreated_atupdated_at
50510Instructional DesignTell us about your experience as an instructional designer.I have more than 30 years of experience combining instructional design, technical writing, technical training, software implementation, and systems documentation. My strongest work is practical training for real systems, real users, and real operational deadlines.

My instructional design experience is closely tied to software implementation, technical training, operational readiness, and documentation that helps people perform real work.

I have built eLearning, instructor-led training, virtual training, Train-the-Trainer materials, job aids, reference guides, software simulations, assessments, instructional videos, and support materials for healthcare, government, ERP, contact center, financial, benefits, and field operations environments.

I do not approach instructional design as an academic exercise first. I approach it by asking what people need to do, what system or process is changing, where confusion is likely, and what kind of learning support will help users succeed after the training is over.

Example from my work

On the Florida Medicaid Modernization project with Automated Health Systems, I designed and produced training materials and instructional videos using Articulate Storyline to support UAT, operational readiness, Service Desk transition-to-production, Provider Services training, Learn Hub/Docebo, Info Hub knowledge management, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Genesys Cloud, operational workflows, call handling procedures, and escalation frameworks.

instructional design, technical training, eLearning, blended learning, operational readiness, adult learning, technical writingFlorida Medicaid Modernization, Automated Health Systems, MAXIMUS, Halliburton, Amtrak, CACI0106/30/202607/02/2026
51520Instructional Design

What is your instructional design process?

My process starts with discovery: who the learners are, what work they need to perform, what is changing, and what outcome the training must support. From there I define objectives, structure the content, build the materials, validate with SMEs, deploy, and revise based on feedback.

My instructional design process is practical and project-driven. I start by understanding the audience, the system or process, the business or operational goal, and the conditions under which learners will use the training.

Then I define learning objectives, organize the content, choose the right delivery format, build the materials, validate them with subject matter experts, support implementation, and revise based on feedback.

ADDIE is part of that thinking, but I do not treat it like a rigid checklist. Real projects usually require iteration, especially when systems are still changing or operational readiness is the goal.

Example from my work

For MAXIMUS and MassHealth, instructional design work required understanding MMIS, HIX/IES, Provider Services, HIPAA, ACA, call center roles, provider enrollment, credentialing, QA, EDI, claims adjudication, LMS needs, and the audiences who would actually use the training.

instructional design process, ADDIE, learner analysis, learning objectives, SME validation, training deploymentMAXIMUS, MassHealth, Florida Medicaid Modernization, Halliburton0106/30/202607/02/2026
52530Instructional Design

How do you use ADDIE in real projects?

I use ADDIE as a practical structure: analyze the need, design the learning approach, develop the content, implement it through the right channel, and evaluate whether it helped people do the work. I adapt it to the schedule and reality of the project.

ADDIE is useful when it stays connected to the work. In analysis, I look at learners, roles, workflows, systems, business needs, and operational risks.

In design, I shape learning objectives, lesson structure, activities, scenarios, and delivery format. In development, I build eLearning, instructor-led training, job aids, videos, guides, and assessments. In implementation, I support LMS deployment, classroom delivery, virtual delivery, UAT support, rollout, or Train-the-Trainer. In evaluation, I use feedback, assessments, SME review, operational readiness, and revisions to improve the material.

The model is useful, but the project still has to move. I use it to keep the work disciplined without making the process heavier than the problem requires.

Example from my work

At Halliburton, training work for ClickSchedule, Job Details Mobility, SAP SD integration, and oilfield operations required analysis of real workflows, design of practical materials, development of WBT and instructor-led content, classroom and one-on-one delivery, UAT support, and post-go-live support.

ADDIE, instructional design model, analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation, rolloutHalliburton, Florida Medicaid Modernization, MAXIMUS, Amtrak0106/30/202607/02/2026
53540Instructional Design

How do you determine what learners actually need?

I look at the learner's job role, current skill level, workflow responsibilities, what is changing, and what they must be able to do after training. I also look for common mistakes, support issues, and points of confusion.

Learner needs are not the same as a list of topics. I want to know what the learner has to do on the job and what will get in the way if the training is weak.

I look at job role, experience level, system access, workflow responsibility, compliance requirements, operational context, and the changes users are expected to absorb.

I also ask what confusion needs to be reduced. If training does not help people make decisions, complete tasks, or avoid predictable mistakes, it is usually too theoretical.

Example from my work

For MassHealth, Halliburton, Florida Medicaid Modernization, and IBM/A.G. Edwards, the learner groups were very different. Call center staff, provider services users, oilfield operations users, branch office users, and support teams each needed training tied to their actual responsibilities.

learner needs analysis, audience analysis, adult learning, job roles, workflow training, performance supportMAXIMUS, MassHealth, Halliburton, Florida Medicaid Modernization, IBM, A.G. Edwards0106/30/202607/02/2026
54550Instructional Design

How do you connect training to business or operational goals?

I connect training to what the organization needs people to do: adopt a system, follow a process, support customers, complete UAT, meet compliance expectations, or perform consistently after go-live.

Training should support an operational result. It may be system adoption, call center readiness, provider support, UAT readiness, compliance, software rollout, reduced confusion, consistent process execution, or post-go-live support.

I try to keep every learning objective connected to something learners must do in the real environment. If a module is interesting but does not help performance, it probably needs to be revised or removed.

This is especially important in implementation work, where training is part of the transition from project activity to operational reality.

Example from my work

Florida Medicaid Modernization training supported operational readiness, Service Desk transition-to-production, Provider Services training, UAT support, Learn Hub/Docebo, Info Hub, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Genesys Cloud, and operational workflows.

operational readiness, system adoption, training goals, UAT support, go-live support, compliance trainingFlorida Medicaid Modernization, Automated Health Systems, MAXIMUS, Halliburton0106/30/202607/02/2026
55560Instructional Design

What kinds of learning content have you created?

I have created eLearning, CBT, WBT, instructor-led training, virtual training, Train-the-Trainer materials, job aids, reference guides, student manuals, instructor guides, simulations, videos, assessments, release notes, quick references, and LMS content.

I have created a wide range of learning and performance-support content, usually tied to systems implementation, operational readiness, or technical training.

  • eLearning, CBT, WBT, instructional videos, and software simulations.
  • Instructor-led, virtual, classroom, and Train-the-Trainer materials.
  • Job aids, quick references, student guides, instructor guides, assessments, knowledge checks, and release notes.
  • LMS-ready content, operational readiness material, UAT support material, and procedural documentation.

The format depends on the learner, the task, and the deployment need.

Example from my work

Across projects for MAXIMUS, Halliburton, Amtrak, CACI, Southern California Edison, Sogeti/CIN Legal Data Services, Global Eagle, and Florida Medicaid Modernization, I have created training material for software systems, enterprise operations, call centers, ERP workflows, government programs, and support organizations.

eLearning, CBT, WBT, ILT, virtual training, Train-the-Trainer, job aids, assessments, LMS contentMAXIMUS, Halliburton, Amtrak, CACI, Southern California Edison, Global Eagle0106/30/202607/02/2026
56570Instructional Design

How do you design training for adult learners?

Adult learners need relevance, respect for their existing experience, clear purpose, realistic examples, and practice that helps them perform real work. I try to avoid training that feels disconnected from the job.

Adult learners usually want to know why the training matters and how it helps them do their work.

I design training around real tasks, job context, clear objectives, examples, practice, and materials learners can use after the class or module is finished.

I also respect what learners already know. Experienced users do not need to be talked down to, and new users need enough structure to build confidence without being overwhelmed.

Example from my work

For Southern California Edison, IBM/A.G. Edwards, NICE Systems, and Halliburton, adult learners were often experienced professionals learning a new system or process under real operational pressure. Training had to be direct, respectful, and useful on the job.

adult learning, job relevance, task-based training, learner experience, practice activities, performance supportSouthern California Edison, IBM, A.G. Edwards, NICE Systems, Halliburton0106/30/202607/02/2026
57580Instructional DesignHow do you simplify complex systems for learners?I break the system into roles, workflows, decisions, screens, exceptions, and outcomes. Learners do not need every technical detail at once; they need the right detail in the order they will use it.

Complex systems become easier to learn when the training follows the work instead of the software menu.

I organize material around roles, common tasks, workflows, decisions, handoffs, exceptions, and the outcomes the learner is responsible for.

That approach works whether the system is Medicaid operations, SAP scheduling, a contact center platform, Salesforce, ERP, API-driven integration, or an operational procedure.

Example from my work

At Halliburton, training for ClickSchedule, Job Details Mobility, and SAP SD integration had to make oilfield scheduling and operational workflows understandable to users across North America.

At Florida Medicaid Modernization, training and knowledge assets had to make Microsoft Dynamics 365, Genesys Cloud, Service Desk workflows, Provider Services processes, and escalation frameworks practical for operational teams.

complex systems training, workflow training, software training, SAP, Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Genesys CloudHalliburton, Florida Medicaid Modernization, Automated Health Systems, Southern California Edison0106/30/202607/02/2026
58590Instructional DesignHow do you work with subject matter experts when designing training?I prepare before SME meetings, ask focused questions, clarify assumptions, validate content, and make review efficient. The goal is to turn expert knowledge into training that learners can actually use.

SME time is valuable, so I try to make every conversation useful.

I prepare by reviewing source material, defining the learning objective, identifying gaps, and writing specific questions. During the conversation, I ask open-ended questions, confirm assumptions, and listen for what learners often misunderstand.

After that, I turn the input into a draft, outline, storyboard, job aid, or module that the SME can review efficiently.

Example from my work

On healthcare, government, aerospace, ERP, and contact center projects, I worked with SMEs, developers, QA staff, operations leaders, trainers, and managers to validate both documentation and training content.

That includes projects with Florida Medicaid Modernization, MAXIMUS, Sagrad, Halliburton, and NICE Systems.

subject matter experts, SME interviews, training design, content validation, storyboards, review processFlorida Medicaid Modernization, MAXIMUS, Sagrad, Halliburton, NICE Systems0106/30/202607/02/2026
59600Instructional DesignHow do you create clear learning objectives?I write objectives around what learners need to do, not just what topics the training will cover. A useful objective connects the lesson to job performance.

Clear learning objectives describe observable performance.

Instead of saying a course will “cover” a topic, I try to define what the learner will be able to do: complete a transaction, respond to a call, follow a process, enter data correctly, recognize an exception, or use a system feature in context.

That makes the training easier to design and easier to evaluate, because the objective is tied to the work.

Example from my work

For MAXIMUS MassHealth, learning objectives had to connect to MMIS, HIX/IES, HIPAA, ACA, Provider Services, Call Center work, Provider Enrollment, Credentialing, QA, EDI, and Claims adjudication tasks.

learning objectives, performance objectives, job tasks, instructional design, training outcomesMAXIMUS, MassHealth, Florida Medicaid Modernization0106/30/202607/02/2026
60610Instructional DesignHow do you decide between eLearning, instructor-led training, job aids, or blended learning?I choose the format based on the task, audience, scale, complexity, and rollout needs. The best answer is often a blend, not a single format.

The delivery format should fit the work. I do not start by assuming everything should be eLearning or everything should be classroom training.

  • eLearning works well for repeatable content that needs scale and consistent delivery.
  • Instructor-led training works well for discussion, coaching, complex changes, and readiness conversations.
  • Job aids work well when people need support at the moment of task performance.
  • Blended learning is useful for complex rollouts where users need explanation, practice, reference material, and reinforcement.
  • Train-the-Trainer works when internal teams need to sustain delivery after the initial rollout.

Example from my work

Halliburton, Southern California Edison, MAXIMUS, and Florida Medicaid Modernization all required practical choices about delivery format. Some content belonged in eLearning, some in instructor-led training, some in job aids, and some in blended rollout support.

eLearning, instructor-led training, job aids, blended learning, Train-the-Trainer, modality selectionHalliburton, Southern California Edison, MAXIMUS, Florida Medicaid Modernization0106/30/202607/02/2026
61620Instructional DesignWhat experience do you have with Articulate Storyline?I have used Articulate Storyline for eLearning, instructional videos, software training, operational readiness, UAT support, and system adoption content. I use it as a practical development tool, not just a presentation wrapper.

Articulate Storyline is useful when the training needs structure, interactivity, scenarios, screen-based instruction, or consistent eLearning delivery.

I have used Storyline to create and update training materials that support real system rollouts, operational readiness, and users learning new processes or tools.

My focus is not making the course look flashy. My focus is making it clear, useful, reviewable, and connected to what learners need to do.

Example from my work

On Florida Medicaid Modernization, I designed and produced training materials and instructional videos using Articulate Storyline for UAT, Service Desk transition-to-production, Provider Services training, operational workflows, and Learn Hub/Docebo deployment.

At Halliburton, I also developed WBT using Articulate Storyline for ClickSchedule, Job Details Mobility, SAP SD integration, and oilfield operations training.

Articulate Storyline, eLearning, instructional videos, software training, operational readiness, UAT supportFlorida Medicaid Modernization, Automated Health Systems, Halliburton, MAXIMUS, Amtrak0106/30/202607/02/2026
62630Instructional DesignWhat experience do you have with Captivate, uPerform, UPK, or other eLearning tools?I have worked with Articulate Storyline, Adobe Captivate, uPerform, Oracle UPK, Camtasia-style video workflows, Adobe tools, and SCORM-oriented development. I choose tools based on the learning need and deployment environment.

I have used several eLearning and simulation tools over the years, including Articulate Storyline, Adobe Captivate, uPerform, Oracle UPK, and Adobe Creative Suite tools.

The tool matters, but the instructional structure matters more. A weak lesson does not become useful just because it was built in a strong tool.

I look at whether the content needs simulation, guided practice, SCORM delivery, Section 508 support, screen capture, branching, LMS tracking, or easier maintenance by an internal team.

Example from my work

For CACI/RWD Technologies, I developed SCORM-, DITA-, and Section 508-compliant eLearning modules and software simulations using uPerform for a Department of Defense initiative supporting the U.S. Military Entrance Processing Command and VIPS.

At Amtrak, I developed and updated web-based, blended, and instructor-led learning materials using uPerform, Articulate Storyline, Adobe Captivate, and Adobe Creative Suite. At Global Eagle, I created training modules using Oracle UPK for Oracle ERP, Salesforce integration, inventory, order management, and aviation enterprise systems.

Adobe Captivate, uPerform, Oracle UPK, SCORM, DITA, Section 508, eLearning tools, software simulationsCACI, RWD Technologies, Amtrak, Global Eagle, Southern California Edison, Sogeti0106/30/202607/02/2026
63640Instructional DesignHow do you design scenario-based learning?I base scenarios on real roles, real workflows, decisions, errors, and exceptions. A good scenario should feel like the learner's work, not like a quiz wearing a costume.

Scenario-based learning is strongest when it is grounded in real job situations.

I start by identifying the user role, workflow, decision point, likely mistake, consequence, and feedback the learner needs. Then I design the scenario so the learner has to apply judgment, not just remember a definition.

Scenarios are especially useful for service desk calls, provider support, scheduling, claims, operational tasks, exception handling, and system workflows.

Example from my work

Florida Medicaid Modernization training involved Service Desk, Provider Services, call handling, escalation frameworks, operational workflows, and knowledge assets. Those topics lend themselves to scenario-based learning because users need to make practical decisions.

Halliburton scheduling and mobility training also required scenarios tied to field operations, workflow decisions, and post-go-live support.

scenario-based learning, decision points, service desk training, provider support, workflow training, exception handlingFlorida Medicaid Modernization, Automated Health Systems, Halliburton, MAXIMUS0106/30/202607/02/2026
64650Instructional DesignHow do you make technical training practical instead of theoretical?I build technical training around tasks, screens, workflows, decisions, troubleshooting, exceptions, and handoffs. Learners need to know how to perform the work, not just describe the system.

Technical training becomes practical when it follows what users actually do.

I focus on the tasks, system screens, workflow steps, decisions, dependencies, troubleshooting points, exceptions, and handoffs that learners will encounter after training.

Concepts still matter, but they should support performance. If the learner cannot apply the concept to the system or process, the training needs more job context.

Example from my work

Southern California Edison training for SAP R/3 ERP, ClickSchedule, ClickAnalyze, CRM, Master Data, workforce scheduling, and enterprise information system adoption required practical task-based training.

NICE Systems administrator and application training also had to be practical for contact center, public safety, healthcare, retail, telecom, gaming/casino, and financial services users.

technical training, task-based learning, workflow training, troubleshooting, software adoption, hands-on practiceSouthern California Edison, NICE Systems, Halliburton, CVS Health0106/30/202607/02/2026
65660Instructional DesignHow do you design assessments, knowledge checks, or practice activities?I design assessments to check job readiness, not just memorization. The best checks ask learners to apply a process, make a decision, recognize an exception, or complete a realistic task.

Assessments should tell us whether learners can apply the material.

I use scenario questions, task-based practice, simulations, quizzes, UAT exercises, procedural checks, and practical activities tied to real outcomes.

Not every training course needs a heavy test. Sometimes a short knowledge check, job aid exercise, or realistic practice activity is enough to confirm understanding and expose confusion.

Example from my work

At Halliburton, I developed assessments, test cases, test scripts, UAT support materials, classroom materials, webinars, one-on-one coaching material, and post-go-live support content.

At System Automation and Florida Medicaid Modernization, training and testing support also had to connect expected behavior to real workflows and user readiness.

assessments, knowledge checks, practice activities, simulations, quizzes, UAT exercises, job readinessHalliburton, System Automation, Florida Medicaid Modernization, MAXIMUS0106/30/202607/02/2026
66670Instructional DesignHow do you measure whether training worked?I look for practical evidence: learner feedback, assessment results, SME feedback, manager feedback, UAT readiness, support readiness, completion, and whether people can perform the required tasks.

I do not invent metrics when they do not exist, but I do look for evidence that training helped.

Useful signals include learner feedback, assessment results, SME feedback, manager feedback, UAT readiness, support readiness, training completion, fewer repeated questions, and whether users can perform the task without additional handholding.

For operational training, the most important question is often simple: are people more ready to do the work after the training than they were before?

Example from my work

For Florida Medicaid Modernization, training supported UAT, Service Desk readiness, Provider Services, operational workflows, and Learn Hub/Docebo deployment. The goal was not just course completion; it was operational readiness.

For IBM/A.G. Edwards and IBM/Wachovia field training, successful training also meant users could operate proprietary financial and securities trading applications during large-scale rollout activity.

training evaluation, learner feedback, assessment results, operational readiness, UAT readiness, support readinessFlorida Medicaid Modernization, IBM, A.G. Edwards, Wachovia0106/30/202607/02/2026
67680Instructional DesignHow do you address accessibility and Section 508 requirements?I address accessibility by planning for readable structure, clear navigation, screen-reader considerations, captions or transcripts where appropriate, usable PDFs, and accessible LMS content. Accessibility works best when it is considered early.

Accessibility should not be treated as a final cleanup task.

I consider structure, navigation, heading order, readable language, contrast, keyboard access, screen-reader needs, captions or transcripts where appropriate, usable PDFs, and LMS delivery requirements.

For Section 508 work, the goal is practical access: learners should be able to use the content, understand the content, and complete the learning activity without unnecessary barriers.

Example from my work

For CACI/RWD Technologies, I developed SCORM-, DITA-, and Section 508-compliant eLearning modules and simulations using uPerform for a Department of Defense initiative.

For MAXIMUS/MassHealth, I also worked with Section 508-compliant LMS selection and deployment considerations in a healthcare and government program environment.

Section 508, accessibility, SCORM, DITA, accessible LMS, captions, screen readers, accessible PDFsCACI, RWD Technologies, MAXIMUS, MassHealth0106/30/202607/02/2026
68690Instructional DesignHow do you design for learners with different experience levels?I layer the content so new learners get enough explanation and experienced learners can move quickly to the details they need. One training asset rarely serves every learner equally unless it is structured carefully.

Different learners need different levels of support.

  • New learners may need context, terms, guided steps, and basic practice.
  • Experienced users may need exceptions, advanced notes, configuration details, or quick reference material.
  • Supervisors may need workflow impact, reporting, escalation, and quality expectations.

I try to build layered training so each group can find the level it needs without forcing everyone through the same path.

Example from my work

At NICE Systems, training audiences included administrators and application users across contact center, public safety, healthcare, retail, telecom, gaming/casino, and financial services environments.

At IBM/A.G. Edwards and IBM/Wachovia, large-scale field training required clear materials for users with different experience levels and different local responsibilities.

learner levels, beginner training, advanced users, layered content, job aids, role-based trainingNICE Systems, IBM, A.G. Edwards, Wachovia, Southern California Edison0106/30/202607/02/2026
69700Instructional DesignHow do you update, rebrand, or modernize existing training materials?I first determine what is still accurate, what changed, what is obsolete, and what needs to be restructured. Then I update content, branding, workflows, screenshots, examples, and delivery format without losing useful material.

Modernizing training is not just changing colors or replacing a logo.

I review the existing material for accuracy, branding, workflow changes, system changes, outdated screenshots, weak structure, accessibility concerns, and the needs of the current learners.

Then I preserve what still works and revise what no longer supports the user or the organization.

Example from my work

On Florida Medicaid Modernization, I rebranded and updated legacy Articulate Storyline assets for the Unified Operations Center rollout, including materials supporting UAT, operational readiness, Service Desk transition-to-production, Provider Services training, and Learn Hub/Docebo deployment.

At Amtrak, I also developed and updated web-based, blended, and instructor-led learning materials using uPerform, Storyline, Captivate, and Adobe Creative Suite.

training modernization, rebranding, legacy training, Articulate Storyline, content updates, workflow changesFlorida Medicaid Modernization, Automated Health Systems, Amtrak0106/30/202607/02/2026
70710Instructional DesignHow do you support LMS implementation or learning deployment?I support LMS work by organizing courses, preparing content, checking accessibility and tracking needs, coordinating review, and making sure learners can find and complete what they need.

LMS deployment is not just uploading files. The course structure, naming, audience assignment, tracking, accessibility, review process, and maintenance plan all matter.

I look at how learners will find the training, how completion will be tracked, what content belongs together, what needs review, and how the material will be updated after deployment.

I also pay attention to the practical handoff: who owns the course after launch, who answers learner questions, and how future updates will be managed.

Example from my work

For MAXIMUS/MassHealth, I supported LMS selection and deployment, including Section 508-compliant learning management considerations.

For Florida Medicaid Modernization, training delivery involved Learn Hub/Docebo, operational readiness, UAT support, Service Desk and Provider Services training, and knowledge assets that needed to fit into the broader support ecosystem.

LMS implementation, learning deployment, Docebo, Learn Hub, course structure, tracking, accessibilityMAXIMUS, MassHealth, Florida Medicaid Modernization, Automated Health Systems0106/30/202607/02/2026
71720Instructional DesignWhat experience do you have with healthcare, government, or compliance training?I have developed training and documentation for healthcare, government, benefits, defense, Medicaid, public utilities, and regulated operational environments. That work often involved compliance, accessibility, system adoption, and readiness for real users.

Healthcare, government, and compliance training require clarity and discipline because the work affects operations, service delivery, privacy, accessibility, and public-facing responsibilities.

I have worked with topics and environments involving Medicaid, MMIS, HIX/IES, HIPAA, ACA, Section 508, provider services, call center readiness, defense-related learning, SAP, and regulated operational processes.

In those settings, training must be accurate, reviewable, accessible, and tied to the way people actually perform the work.

Example from my work

MAXIMUS/MassHealth involved MMIS, HIX/IES, HIPAA, ACA, Provider Services, Call Center staff, Provider Enrollment, Credentialing, QA, EDI, Claims adjudication, LMS selection/deployment, and Section 508-compliant learning management work.

CACI/RWD Technologies involved SCORM-, DITA-, and Section 508-compliant eLearning modules for a Department of Defense initiative. Florida Medicaid Modernization involved training and operational readiness for healthcare service operations.

healthcare training, government training, compliance training, Medicaid, HIPAA, ACA, Section 508, MMISMAXIMUS, MassHealth, CACI, RWD Technologies, Florida Medicaid Modernization0106/30/202607/02/2026
72730Instructional DesignWhat is one of the more complex learning programs you helped develop?One complex example was the MassHealth/MAXIMUS training work because it involved healthcare operations, MMIS, HIX/IES, provider services, credentialing, claims, QA, EDI, LMS deployment, compliance, and multiple learner groups.

The MassHealth/MAXIMUS work stands out because the learning environment was broad and operationally important.

The content had to support MMIS, HIX/IES, HIPAA, ACA, Provider Services, Call Center staff, Provider Enrollment, Credentialing, QA, EDI, Claims adjudication, LMS selection and deployment, Section 508 considerations, instructor-led training, virtual training, and eLearning.

That kind of program requires more than course development. It requires understanding roles, workflows, systems, compliance expectations, delivery constraints, and how the training will be maintained.

Example from my work

MAXIMUS/Commonwealth of Massachusetts MassHealth required CBT/eLearning modules, instructor-led and virtual training, provider services support, LMS selection/deployment, and Section 508-compliant learning management considerations.

Another large-scale example was IBM/A.G. Edwards, where a national rollout involved 12,000 users across 690 branch offices with a 75-instructor team.

complex learning program, MassHealth, MMIS, HIX, IES, LMS, provider services, national rolloutMAXIMUS, MassHealth, IBM, A.G. Edwards0106/30/202607/02/2026
73740Instructional DesignHow do you handle feedback from stakeholders or learners?I treat feedback as part of the design cycle. I separate accuracy issues, usability issues, learner confusion, stakeholder preference, and scope changes so revisions stay practical and controlled.

Feedback is most useful when it is sorted and acted on thoughtfully.

I separate factual corrections from preference, usability issues, learner confusion, SME concerns, stakeholder direction, and scope changes.

That helps keep the work collaborative without letting every comment pull the training in a different direction. The goal is better learning, not just satisfying the loudest reviewer.

Example from my work

On projects such as Florida Medicaid Modernization, Halliburton, MAXIMUS, Amtrak, and Southern California Edison, feedback came from SMEs, learners, trainers, managers, QA staff, product owners, and operations teams.

Handling that feedback well meant keeping the content accurate, practical, reviewable, and focused on what learners needed to do.

stakeholder feedback, learner feedback, training revision, SME review, usability, instructional design reviewFlorida Medicaid Modernization, Halliburton, MAXIMUS, Amtrak, Southern California Edison0106/30/202607/02/2026
74750Instructional DesignWhat should a hiring manager know about your instructional design style?My style is practical, systems-aware, learner-focused, and grounded in technical writing and training delivery. I design training to help people perform real work, not just complete a polished course.

A hiring manager should know that my instructional design style is practical and connected to real systems.

I bring technical writing, software implementation, systems documentation, training delivery, and adult learning together. That helps me understand both the content and the conditions under which learners will use it.

I care about structure, clarity, realistic examples, reviewable content, and training that supports job performance. I am not just trying to build attractive courses. I am trying to help people understand a system, follow a process, and do their work with more confidence.

Example from my work

That style shows up across Florida Medicaid Modernization, MAXIMUS/MassHealth, Halliburton, Amtrak, CACI, Southern California Edison, Global Eagle, NICE Systems, and IBM field training work.

The common thread is practical learning support for people who need to use systems, follow processes, support customers, meet compliance expectations, or perform operational work.

instructional design style, practical training, systems-aware learning, adult learning, technical training, performance supportFlorida Medicaid Modernization, MAXIMUS, Halliburton, Amtrak, CACI, Southern California Edison, IBM0106/30/202607/02/2026